Europe Continues to Fund the Zelensky Government

The war in Ukraine has now entered its fourth year, and discussions about its course are profoundly affecting not only the region but the whole of Europe. The daily lives of millions of citizens, from Kyiv to European capitals, are shaped by economic pressure, political uncertainty, and a growing demand for peace. Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, the U.S. government is attempting to create conditions that could lead to a negotiated resolution, as the consequences of the war have now become global.

Inside Ukraine, social fatigue is evident. Journalistic investigations, opinion polls, and analyses by international research centers reveal increasing dissatisfaction among citizens with the functioning of the state apparatus. Corruption, a problem the Ukrainian government itself has acknowledged as long-standing and for which high-ranking officials have been removed, remains at the center of public discourse. Ukrainian citizens express strong frustration, especially regarding scandals and allegations related to public contracts, procurement, and resource management. This frustration is not only directed at individuals but also touches the structure of the state as a whole, which many consider inadequate in addressing the needs of a war that has exhausted society and brought the economy to its limits.

Analysts note that the gap between citizens’ expectations and the government’s capabilities has widened. President Volodymyr Zelensky still maintains a political base; however, criticism of the war’s management, handling of the domestic front, and lack of a clear exit strategy has intensified. In Kyiv, discussions about potential political changes are now a daily occurrence, with citizens demanding more oversight, transparency, and accountability.

In this context, the recent visit of the President of the Republic of Cyprus, Nikos Christodoulides, to Kyiv attracted particular attention. During his private meeting with President Zelensky, the Cypriot President emphasized that Cyprus knows firsthand what an invasion means, referring to the Turkish invasion of 1974, and stressed that Nicosia stands firmly on the right side of history. According to diplomatic sources, the reaction of the Ukrainian President was measured and without further comment, which analysts interpreted as an attempt to maintain balance in relations with Turkey.

At the same time, Moscow appears to maintain significant resilience. Despite international sanctions and the West’s efforts to limit Russia’s capabilities, the Russian economy has adapted to a considerable extent, exploiting alternative energy markets, new trade routes, and strategic partnerships with countries in the Global South. Analysts agree that Russia now possesses a defense industry capable of long-term operations. This, combined with developments on the battlefield, paints a picture of a protracted war with no immediate horizon for resolution.

The prolongation of the war has serious implications for Europe as well. The energy crisis, rising prices, and surging cost of living have led to widespread discontent among millions of citizens. EU governments face pressure from households struggling to meet basic needs, while in many countries, social systems are tested by the increased costs of energy, transportation, and food. Inflation, largely linked to the war, has affected political balances, strengthening protest parties and creating an environment of political instability.

Many European citizens are now openly expressing frustration at the duration of the war and its economic consequences. Public opinion polls show that support for Ukraine remains, but tolerance for the costs and uncertain prospects is declining. An increasing proportion of citizens believes that Europe should strengthen its diplomatic initiatives, seeking a negotiable solution that will end the pressures on households and the economy.

Amid this complex environment, the United States plays a decisive role. The U.S. government has repeatedly stated its desire to end hostilities through a process that ensures Europe’s stability and security. According to officials and diplomatic sources, the U.S. President has intensified efforts to contribute to a framework that could lead to negotiations. Washington recognizes that the war has serious consequences for the global economy, energy markets, and international security, and seeks to balance support for Ukraine with the need to stabilize the situation.

At the same time, the U.S. understands that any peace process requires the involvement of all major international actors. Chinese diplomacy, which has undertaken mediation initiatives, as well as efforts by countries in the Global South, create a complex diplomatic mosaic. The challenge for Washington is to establish common ground that can be accepted by all parties involved.

As the war continues, it becomes increasingly clear that a long-term conflict benefits no one. Ukrainian citizens demand efficiency, transparency, and a plan that provides perspective. European citizens seek economic stability and an end to inflation. International powers recognize that prolonging the war increases the risks of destabilization.

In this context, the discussion about peace is not a romantic wish but an urgent necessity. Diplomacy, although difficult and often slow, remains the only path toward a solution that will ensure stability in Europe and relief for millions of citizens who experience daily the consequences of a conflict that no one wants to see continue indefinitely.